Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Why did Bareev lose? (Patzer UCI Leiden)

Author: Drexel,Michael

Date: 11:43:10 04/07/04

Go up one level in this thread


On April 07, 2004 at 14:13:09, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On April 07, 2004 at 12:31:53, Mihaly Szalai wrote:
>
>>On April 07, 2004 at 10:36:14, Eduard Nemeth wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>[D]8/5p2/6k1/2P1Q1p1/5p2/4qP2/6PK/8 w - - 0 1
>>>
>>>Eduard
>>>
>>Szia Eduard,
>>
>>analysis on my Celeron 1.7 GHz machine.
>>
>>PatzerUCI Leiden  UCI 73 MB:
>> 1+  00:00  2,26   Qe5xe3
>> 2-  00:00  1,06   Qe5xe3 f4xe3
>> 2   00:00 -0,10   Qe5xe3 f4xe3 Kh2g3 Kg6f5
>> 2   00:00  1,03   Qe5e4+ Kg6f6
>> 3   00:00  0,85   Qe5e4+ Qe3xe4 f3xe4
>> 3   00:00  1,07   Qe5d6+ Kg6g7 c5c6
>> 4   00:00  1,07   Qe5d6+ Kg6g7 c5c6 Qe3c3
>> 5+  00:00  1,42   Qe5d6+
>> 6   00:01  1,90   Qe5d6+ f7f6 c5c6 Qe3c1 Qd6d7 f6f5
>> 7   00:01  2,12   Qe5d6+ Kg6g7 c5c6 Qe3c1 Qd6d7
>> 8   00:02  2,10   Qe5d6+ f7f6 c5c6 g5g4 Qd6d7 g4g3+ Kh2h3
>> 9   00:04  2,12   Qe5d6+ Kg6h5 Qd6d5 Qe3e8 c5c6
>>10   00:06  2,14   Qe5d6+ Kg6h5 Qd6f8 Kh5g6 c5c6 Qe3c1 Qf8d6+ Kg6g7
>>11-  00:12  1,79   Qe5d6+ f7f6
>>11   00:30  1,79   Qe5d6+ f7f6 Qd6d5 Qe3e7 Qd5g8+ Kg6h5 c5c6 Qe7c7 Qg8e8+ Kh5h6
>>Kh2h3
>>12   00:36  1,54   Qe5d6+ f7f6 c5c6 Qe3e1 Qd6d3+ f6f5
>>12+  00:54  2,14   Qe5xe3
>>13   01:41  9,09   Qe5xe3 f4xe3 Kh2g1 Kg6f6 Kg1f1 Kf6e6 Kf1e2 Ke6d5 Ke2xe3
>>Kd5xc5 Ke3e4 f7f5+ Ke4xf5
>>14   02:00  9,09   Qe5xe3 f4xe3 Kh2g1 Kg6f6 Kg1f1 Kf6e6 Kf1e2 Ke6d5 Ke2xe3
>>Kd5xc5 Ke3e4 f7f5+ Ke4xf5
>>
>>Üdv.
>>Misi
>
>
>I believe you will find that 9.09 score is wrong.  I let crafty run through
>depth=20 and it was reporting +1.3...  Qxe3+ is a dead draw it seems.  Qd6+
>holds some slight chances for white:

No, the pawn endgame is dead lost for black of course.

Michael



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.