Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 11:51:12 04/07/04
Go up one level in this thread
On April 07, 2004 at 14:43:10, Drexel,Michael wrote:
>On April 07, 2004 at 14:13:09, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On April 07, 2004 at 12:31:53, Mihaly Szalai wrote:
>>
>>>On April 07, 2004 at 10:36:14, Eduard Nemeth wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>[D]8/5p2/6k1/2P1Q1p1/5p2/4qP2/6PK/8 w - - 0 1
>>>>
>>>>Eduard
>>>>
>>>Szia Eduard,
>>>
>>>analysis on my Celeron 1.7 GHz machine.
>>>
>>>PatzerUCI Leiden UCI 73 MB:
>>> 1+ 00:00 2,26 Qe5xe3
>>> 2- 00:00 1,06 Qe5xe3 f4xe3
>>> 2 00:00 -0,10 Qe5xe3 f4xe3 Kh2g3 Kg6f5
>>> 2 00:00 1,03 Qe5e4+ Kg6f6
>>> 3 00:00 0,85 Qe5e4+ Qe3xe4 f3xe4
>>> 3 00:00 1,07 Qe5d6+ Kg6g7 c5c6
>>> 4 00:00 1,07 Qe5d6+ Kg6g7 c5c6 Qe3c3
>>> 5+ 00:00 1,42 Qe5d6+
>>> 6 00:01 1,90 Qe5d6+ f7f6 c5c6 Qe3c1 Qd6d7 f6f5
>>> 7 00:01 2,12 Qe5d6+ Kg6g7 c5c6 Qe3c1 Qd6d7
>>> 8 00:02 2,10 Qe5d6+ f7f6 c5c6 g5g4 Qd6d7 g4g3+ Kh2h3
>>> 9 00:04 2,12 Qe5d6+ Kg6h5 Qd6d5 Qe3e8 c5c6
>>>10 00:06 2,14 Qe5d6+ Kg6h5 Qd6f8 Kh5g6 c5c6 Qe3c1 Qf8d6+ Kg6g7
>>>11- 00:12 1,79 Qe5d6+ f7f6
>>>11 00:30 1,79 Qe5d6+ f7f6 Qd6d5 Qe3e7 Qd5g8+ Kg6h5 c5c6 Qe7c7 Qg8e8+ Kh5h6
>>>Kh2h3
>>>12 00:36 1,54 Qe5d6+ f7f6 c5c6 Qe3e1 Qd6d3+ f6f5
>>>12+ 00:54 2,14 Qe5xe3
>>>13 01:41 9,09 Qe5xe3 f4xe3 Kh2g1 Kg6f6 Kg1f1 Kf6e6 Kf1e2 Ke6d5 Ke2xe3
>>>Kd5xc5 Ke3e4 f7f5+ Ke4xf5
>>>14 02:00 9,09 Qe5xe3 f4xe3 Kh2g1 Kg6f6 Kg1f1 Kf6e6 Kf1e2 Ke6d5 Ke2xe3
>>>Kd5xc5 Ke3e4 f7f5+ Ke4xf5
>>>
>>>Üdv.
>>>Misi
>>
>>
>>I believe you will find that 9.09 score is wrong. I let crafty run through
>>depth=20 and it was reporting +1.3... Qxe3+ is a dead draw it seems. Qd6+
>>holds some slight chances for white:
>
>No, the pawn endgame is dead lost for black of course.
>
>Michael
I looked but I don't see it...
Qxe3 fxe3 Kf6 Kf1 Ke5 Ke2 and how does white win? Opposition doesn't work as
black has a pawn move to make where white does not. Crafty says dead draw with
6 piece endgame tables:
20-> 20.30 0.01 3. Kf1 Ke5 4. Ke2 f5 5. Kxe3 Kd5 6.
Kd3 Kxc5 7. g4 fxg4 <EGTB>
21 23.40 0.01 3. Kf1 Ke5 4. Ke2 f5 5. Kxe3 Kd5 6.
Kd3 Kxc5 7. g4 fxg4 <EGTB>
21-> 41.46 0.01 3. Kf1 Ke5 4. Ke2 f5 5. Kxe3 Kd5 6.
Kd3 Kxc5 7. g4 fxg4 <EGTB>
22 44.99 0.01 3. Kf1 Ke5 4. Ke2 f5 5. Kxe3 Kd5 6.
Kd3 Kxc5 7. g4 fxg4 <EGTB>
22-> 1:04 0.01 3. Kf1 Ke5 4. Ke2 f5 5. Kxe3 Kd5 6.
Kd3 Kxc5 7. g4 fxg4 <EGTB>
23 1:10 0.01 3. Kf1 Ke5 4. Ke2 f5 5. Kxe3 Kd5 6.
Kd3 Kxc5 7. g4 fxg4 <EGTB>
I agree that the distant white pawn looks problematic, but the black e pawn is
also a problem that burns tempi to stop... What do you suggest after we play
this out to the above? Or would you vary somewhere along the line. I can rin
most anything at the moment...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.