Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Why did Bareev lose? (Patzer UCI Leiden) (more)

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 11:54:25 04/07/04

Go up one level in this thread


Deeper search reveals more:

               24     1:59     +1   3. Kf1!!
               24     2:08     +3   3. Kf1!!
               24     2:10     +M   3. Kf1!!
               24     5:32  Mat29   3. Kf1 Ke6 4. Ke2 f5 5. Kxe3 Kd5 6.
                                    f4 g4 7. c6 Kxc6 8. Kd4 Kd6 9. g3 Ke6
                                    10. Kc5 Ke7 11. Kd5 Kf6 12. Kd6 <HT>

So it seems you were correct...  I am still looking at it from a human
perspective to see how white wins...

This is one of those subtle cases where white can immediately hit a 6 piece
ending and draw, but some subtle delay lets white reach a different (and won) 6
piece ending it seems..




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.