Author: Uri Blass
Date: 15:12:11 04/07/04
Go up one level in this thread
On April 07, 2004 at 17:42:07, Dieter Buerssner wrote: >On April 07, 2004 at 12:31:53, Mihaly Szalai wrote: > >>On April 07, 2004 at 10:36:14, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>[D]8/5p2/6k1/2P1Q1p1/5p2/4qP2/6PK/8 w - - 0 1 >>> >>>Eduard >>> >>Szia Eduard, >> >>analysis on my Celeron 1.7 GHz machine. >> >>PatzerUCI Leiden UCI 73 MB: >>12 00:36 1,54 Qe5d6+ f7f6 c5c6 Qe3e1 Qd6d3+ f6f5 >>12+ 00:54 2,14 Qe5xe3 >>13 01:41 9,09 Qe5xe3 f4xe3 Kh2g1 Kg6f6 Kg1f1 Kf6e6 Kf1e2 Ke6d5 Ke2xe3 >>Kd5xc5 Ke3e4 f7f5+ Ke4xf5 >>14 02:00 9,09 Qe5xe3 f4xe3 Kh2g1 Kg6f6 Kg1f1 Kf6e6 Kf1e2 Ke6d5 Ke2xe3 >>Kd5xc5 Ke3e4 f7f5+ Ke4xf5 > >Phantastic by Patzer. I wonder, what magic he is doing here. I first thought, >very aggressively extending pawn endgame positions (when the root position is >not a pawn endgame) should help. But it is still rather deep, when the Qs are >already from the board. Very impressive. Another possibility may be statically evaluating the following position as +9 humans may do it thanks to experience in analyzing similiar positions. [D]8/8/4k3/5p2/3K1Pp1/6P1/8/8 w - - 0 10 Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.