Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Why did Bareev lose? (Patzer UCI Leiden)

Author: Dieter Buerssner

Date: 17:09:43 04/07/04

Go up one level in this thread


On April 07, 2004 at 20:01:08, Dieter Buerssner wrote:

> 178196163  3:17.0   4.90 15++ 1.Qxe3 fxe3 2.Kg1 Kf6 3.Kf1 Ke6 4.Ke2 f5 5.Kxe3
>                               Ke5 6.f4+ Kf6 7.fxg5+ Kxg5 8.c6 f4+ 9.Ke4 Kg6
>                               10.c7 f3 11.c8=Q f2

And

 372091344  6:37.7   9.90 15++ 1.Qxe3 fxe3 2.Kg1 Kf6 3.Kf1 Ke6 4.Ke2 f5 5.Kxe3
                               Ke5 6.f4+ Kf6 7.fxg5+ Kxg5 8.c6 f4+ 9.Ke4 Kg4
                               10.c7 Kg3 11.c8=Q Kf2
 673817325 11:57.5   9.90 15t  1.Qxe3 fxe3 2.Kg1 Kf5H 3.Kf1H f6H 4.Ke2H Ke6H
                               5.Kxe3H Kd5H 6.f4H Kxc5H 7.fxg5H Kd5H 8.Kf4H
                               Ke6H 9.g6H f5H 10.Kg5H f4H 11.Kh5H Ke7H 12.Kh4H
                               Kf6H 13.Kh3H Ke7H 14.Kh2H Ke6H 15.g7H Kf7H
                               16.Kh3H f3H 17.Kg4H f2H 18.Kf5H f1=Q+H 19.Ke4H
                               {HT} {-841}

Unfortunately, much of the PVs are from the hash or in lines that were
calculated out of the window. So they may look very stupid (especially further
down - I did not check it).

Regards,
Dieter



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.