Author: Lanny DiBartolomeo
Date: 12:08:53 12/13/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 13, 1998 at 03:38:51, Laurence Chen wrote: >On December 12, 1998 at 21:57:28, Lanny DiBartolomeo wrote: > >>And your basing this on a cm2000 program (which is a totally different engine) >>and 1chess position from GM kasparov that cm6000 couldnt find? I can come up >>with plenty of examples in which it can find, as a matter of fact there was a >>post of a position in which fritz5 didnt find and cm6000 and rebel10 found. >>No one said that cm6000 finds all the moves no one, not even GMkasparov could. >>But I do Know about static advantages and dynamic play and i know most people >>here do! And cm6000 plays very well it plays the position and what the position >>calls for it will find a majority of the time be it static or dynamic it has >>given exchange sacs on me a number of times and continued with play why? not >>because it saw it would win back material but it created enough pressure on the >>board for the sac! SO, sorry but you are not talking about the same program i >>play against. >Sorry, I am basing this on my copy of CM 6000, all I said is that I have >previous copies of CM, since the early beginning, and that was the style the >engine played, and it has been improved since. All chess engines are prisoners >of the style or heuristics that the programmer designed. Of course there are >positions that CM 6000 will find the right move and Fritz 5.16 will fail, I said >that in my posting, and I said that in positions which static elements are >predominant CM will find the right move, however, in complex positions, which >dynamic elements and hidden resources are present, CM 6000 will fail to find the >right plan, and Fritz will find the right one. My point was, one must not be >blind in using only one chess engine to analyze a chess position, but one must >consider the type of position then apply the appropriate one. It is like >penicilin being misused in the medical field, at one time it was thought to be a >miracle drug, and a lot of doctors prescribed to its patients, now it is >alarming to find that some bacterias are becoming immune to penicilin due to the >abuse of the drug, that is, over prescription of the use of the drug when it was >not needed. So the same happens when one becomes blind to one type of chess >engine. If you want to improve your game in chess, you must be flexible. What I was trying to say is that cm5000-cm6000 are stuck with the same engine/programmer the engine is a Totally new and different engine from the other versions so it does not use the same analysing methods it uses "the King" engine and I hope EVERYONE knows this engine is not a static searcher!! It is one of the most agrressive engines!It plays very dynamic it tries to create play it even gives up material For an initiative! I hope you log in under Im the next bobby Fischer cause this is the top setting to enter in at, other entrys are 200pts lower atleast!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.