Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 06:36:48 04/08/04
Go up one level in this thread
On April 08, 2004 at 09:21:09, David H. McClain wrote:
>RollingThunder: Shredder 7.04 Classic GUI Intel P3 1000mz 512RAM
>Krynos: Rebel 12.00.01 Athlon 3200 512RAM
>
>[Event "ICC 10 6"]
>[Site "Internet Chess Club"]
>[Date "2004.04.08"]
>[Round "-"]
>[White "RollingThunder"]
>[Black "Kronos"]
>[WhiteElo "2777"]
>[BlackElo "2819"]
>[ECO "D87"]
>[Result "1/2-1/2"]
>
>1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 d5 4. cxd5 Nxd5 5. e4 Nxc3
>6. bxc3 Bg7 7. Bc4 c5 8. Ne2 Nc6 9. Be3 O-O 10. O-O Bg4
>11. f3 Na5 12. Bxf7+ Rxf7 13. fxg4 Rxf1+ 14. Kxf1 cxd4
>15. cxd4 e5 16. d5 Nc4 17. Qd3 b5 18. Kg1 Nxe3 19. Qxe3 Bf8
>20. Kh1 Qa5 21. Qg5 Qa6 22. Ng3 Bg7 23. Qd2 Rc8 24. d6 Qc6
>25. d7 Rd8 26. Rd1 Bf6 27. Qd3 a6 28. h3 Be7 29. Kh2 Qe6
>30. Qd2 b4 31. Kh1 Qc4 32. Kh2 Qe6 33. Nf1 Kf7 34. Kh1 Qc4
>35. Nh2 Kg8 36. Nf3 Qe6 37. Kh2 Kg7 38. Kg1 h6 39. Qd5 Qxd5
>40. Rxd5 Bf6 41. Nd2 Kf7 42. Nc4 Ke6 43. Nb6 Be7 44. Ra5
>Rg8 45. Kf2 Bd8 46. Rxa6 Bxb6+ 47. Rxb6+ Kxd7 48. Rxb4 Ke6
>49. a4 Ra8 50. Ke3 g5 51. g3 Kd7 52. Kd3 Kc6 53. Kc4 Ra7
>54. Kb3 Kc5 55. Rc4+ Kd6 56. Ka3 Ra8 57. Rc3 Rf8 58. a5 Rf1
>59. Rc4 Rf7 60. Ka4 Rf8 61. a6 Rb8 62. Ka5 Ra8 63. Rc3 Kd7
>64. Rc5 Kd6 65. Rd5+ Kc6 66. Rxe5 Kd7 67. Rd5+ Kc6 68. Rb5
>Kd6 69. e5+ Kc6 70. Rb6+ Kd5 71. Rxh6 Kxe5 72. Rg6 Ke4
>73. Rxg5 Kf3 74. Kb6 Kxg3 75. a7 Kxh3 76. Kb7 Rf8 77. Rf5
>Rd8 78. a8=Q Rxa8 79. Kxa8 Kxg4 80. Rf8 Kg5 81. Kb8 Kg6
>82. Kc7 Kg5 83. Kc6 Kg6 84. Kd6 Kg5 85. Ke6 Kg4 86. Kd5 Kg5
>87. Ke4 Kg6 88. Ke5 Kg5 89. Ke4 Kg6 90. Ke5 Kg5 91. Rd8 Kg4
>92. Ke4 Kg5 93. Ke5 Kg4 94. Ke4 Kg5 95. Rd6 Kg4 96. Rg6+
>Kh5 97. Rg8 Kh6 98. Kf5 Kh7 99. Rg6 Kh8 100. Kf4 Kh7
>101. Kf5 Kh8 102. Kf4 Kh7 103. Kg5 Kh8 104. Kf5 Kh7
>105. Rf6 Kg7 106. Ke6 Kh8 107. Kf5 Kg7 108. Ke6 Kh8
>109. Kf5 Kg7 {Game drawn by repetition} 1/2-1/2
>
>This Shredder 7.04 bug has been fairly persistent in it's inability to win with
>KR vs K. I know this has been discussed before. I would like to know if this
>inconsistency has appeared in Shredder 8?
>
>DHM
[D]K7/8/8/5R2/6k1/8/8/8 w - - 0 80
Position after 79...Kxg4
Are you sure that your setup is correct. I have just checked with
Shredder 7.04 but with/without tablebases the program easily wins
this position. With EGTB the moves come instantly, without EGTB
the program after move 83 sees mate in X by mere calulation.
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.