Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 20:16:36 04/08/04
Go up one level in this thread
On April 08, 2004 at 18:32:24, Ed Schröder wrote: >On April 08, 2004 at 17:48:28, Tord Romstad wrote: > >>Hi Ed, >> >>On April 08, 2004 at 17:34:50, Ed Schröder wrote: >> >>>I assume the internal organization of my >>>search is different than other programs although the outcome and behavior is the >>>same. > >>This is almost certainly true. If you ever decide to continue the work on your >>Rebel pages, >>I think it would be a good idea to include a very short pseudo-code version of >>the high-level >>structure of your search. This would help you to avoid a lot of confusion and >>basic questions. > >Sounds like a fine idea to me. > > >>This is of course not meant as a serious criticism of your pages. It is still >>by far the best >>chess programming resource on the Web. > >It's different in several aspects, the most important one, one need to have a >working chess program. The page doesn't address all kind of different search >techniques, it doesn't tell you how to implement A/B or hash tables, nor QS as >there are many good pages already present on the Net. > >So my starting point was different and as far as I know it's the only page on >the Internet that has this starting point. It's easy then to call it the best >page on the Web :) > >Arrivederci, > >Ed I'm still hoping you'll continue where you left off! :-) :-) Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.