Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 11:42:28 04/09/04
Go up one level in this thread
On April 09, 2004 at 13:03:26, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On April 09, 2004 at 12:01:20, rasjid chan wrote: > >I completely agree with Christophe. > >Faster than bitboards for complex software is using my publicly posted as Gerd >says "straightforward code" to generate moves. Complex software, as in detecting fortresses and trapped pieces? :) >Without inline assembly at opteron bitboards is just dead slow. Yeah I see what you mean, if I replace those five lines of assembler with C inlines I get a wopping speed penalty of 3%. Loops are also dead slow btw, so bitboards catch up in other areas. Considering the grand total it's not an easy comparison to make. >Who wants to program in assembly in the year 2004? Not me. -S.
This page took 0.06 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.