Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 11:26:56 04/12/04
Go up one level in this thread
On April 12, 2004 at 14:08:42, George Tsavdaris wrote:
>On April 12, 2004 at 12:16:03, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>Results round 70 (10.7) of 140
>>Résultats ronde 70 (10.7) de 140
>>Resultate Runde 70 (10.7) von 140
>>
>>1-0 The King 3.23 X vs Junior 8
>>1/2 Hiarcs 9 vs List 5.13
>>1-0 Fritz 8 vs Ruffian 2.1.0
>>1-0 Aristarch 4.41 vs Shredder 8
>>
>>Standing/Tableau/Stand
>>1.) 40.5 = Shredder 8
>>2.) 39.0 = Junior 8
>>3.) 38.0 = Hiarcs 9
>>4.) 36.5 = The King 3.23 X
>>5.) 36.0 = Fritz 8
>>6.) 30.5 = Ruffian 2.1.0
>>7.) 30.0 = List 5.13
>>8.) 29.5 = Aristarch 4.41
>>
>>Details, standing and games at
>>[http://www.utzingerkurt.com/rk2004.htm]
>
> How great engine is The King 3.23! It's an old engine between all the new
>ones, but it still can be in the top places. And i bet if you had used SKR
>settings it would be in the top 2. I'm LOOKING FORWARD for the new "The King".
>
>I wonder if SKR settings would make the new "The King" engine better....
Hi George
We are of course very much interested in a comparison between
CM9_X and CM9_SKR and have therefore also played all 70 games
with the SKR-settings. The score of the latter setting was
however "only" 32.5/70 with the following results:
60 % vs Aristarch 4.41 (6.0-4.)
30 % vs List 5.13 (3.0-7.0 !!)
40 % vs Fritz 8 (4.0-6.0)
65 % vs Ruffian 2.1.0 (6.5-3.5)
40 % vs Hiarcs 9 (4.0-6.0)
35 % vs Shredder8 (3.5-6.5)
55 % vs Junior8 (5.5-4.5)
This was a slight disappointment but of course a sign that
CM9 X could even be stronger than CM9 SKR at longer time controls
what is the intention of our new setting.
Kind regards
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.