Author: Mark Young
Date: 01:48:20 12/14/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 14, 1998 at 04:04:05, Didzis Cirulis wrote: >On December 14, 1998 at 03:08:52, Mark Young wrote: > >>On December 14, 1998 at 02:15:55, Didzis Cirulis wrote: >> >>>Hi, >>>Pentium 200MMX, 30 min/game, standard Hash table size (by mistake, as I forgot >>>to change this back after I reinstalled Chessmaster). 44 games played >>> >>> W L D Score >>>CM 6555 16 11 17 24.5 >>>CM 6000-4 11 16 17 19.5 >>> >>>CM6555 still looks to be the best. >> >>I have my doubts, when I jumped to game in 30 min CM6555 starts to have a big >>drop off. My games in 15 min are like your game in 30 min. and at game in 15 on >>my computer CM6555 was still doing well. So you will need to test at game 1hr. >>to confirm my findings. >> >>I played some games at 60/90. Test 4, and default and SS=10 are doing much >>better so far. And the longer the time controls get the better default is >>looking on a P II 400. I think it my be best. But more testing will tell. >> > >So, Mark, what is your proposal? To play a tournament games? 40/120? It will >take tame a lot. But Ok, I can play 40/120 on my home PC while I am at work. But >Is for sure, those tests should be coordinated somehow, all work has to be >distributed among the group of interested testers,and all results must be >gathered into one place. Otherwise this all testing is not very effective. >MY proposal is as follows: I can offer my web page as an "easy to access" place >for everyone to see the latest results, and me :-) as one who could upload them >there upon receiving from you. This applies to 40/120 games only. Maybe later >the results of CM vs other opponents may be added there as well. Something like this will have to be done, if we are to find the best long time control settings. What plays strong at fast time controls seems to be playing weaker at longer time controls. This will make the job of finding good settings much harder, if we can not count on the settings being strong at fast and slow time controls. But if the point is to find just stronger fast setting, the way we are doing it will work fine. > >Didzis
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.