Author: Mark Young
Date: 03:20:11 12/14/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 14, 1998 at 05:18:25, Didzis Cirulis wrote: >On December 14, 1998 at 04:48:20, Mark Young wrote: > >>On December 14, 1998 at 04:04:05, Didzis Cirulis wrote: >> >>>On December 14, 1998 at 03:08:52, Mark Young wrote: >>> >>>>On December 14, 1998 at 02:15:55, Didzis Cirulis wrote: >>>> >>>>>Hi, >>>>>Pentium 200MMX, 30 min/game, standard Hash table size (by mistake, as I forgot >>>>>to change this back after I reinstalled Chessmaster). 44 games played >>>>> >>>>> W L D Score >>>>>CM 6555 16 11 17 24.5 >>>>>CM 6000-4 11 16 17 19.5 >>>>> >>>>>CM6555 still looks to be the best. >>>> >>>>I have my doubts, when I jumped to game in 30 min CM6555 starts to have a big >>>>drop off. My games in 15 min are like your game in 30 min. and at game in 15 on >>>>my computer CM6555 was still doing well. So you will need to test at game 1hr. >>>>to confirm my findings. >>>> >>>>I played some games at 60/90. Test 4, and default and SS=10 are doing much >>>>better so far. And the longer the time controls get the better default is >>>>looking on a P II 400. I think it my be best. But more testing will tell. >>>> >>> >>>So, Mark, what is your proposal? To play a tournament games? 40/120? It will >>>take tame a lot. But Ok, I can play 40/120 on my home PC while I am at work. But >>>Is for sure, those tests should be coordinated somehow, all work has to be >>>distributed among the group of interested testers,and all results must be >>>gathered into one place. Otherwise this all testing is not very effective. >>>MY proposal is as follows: I can offer my web page as an "easy to access" place >>>for everyone to see the latest results, and me :-) as one who could upload them >>>there upon receiving from you. This applies to 40/120 games only. Maybe later >>>the results of CM vs other opponents may be added there as well. >> >>Something like this will have to be done, if we are to find the best long time >>control settings. What plays strong at fast time controls seems to be playing >>weaker at longer time controls. This will make the job of finding good settings >>much harder, if we can not count on the settings being strong at fast and slow >>time controls. But if the point is to find just stronger fast setting, the way >>we are doing it will work fine. >> >Yes, but this is not an answer to my proposal, Mark.:-) I said I am crazy enough >to undertake some coordination work, and people may send in their test results. >Are you ready to take part in this? Sure, I test programs everyday. I have a spare computer I can help test settings on. Lets get some people together, and chose some settings to test. > >Didzis
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.