Author: Harald Faber
Date: 03:28:16 12/14/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 12, 1998 at 19:04:07, Detlef Pordzik wrote: >There were times, long gone, - where people took a criticism against " their " >product as a personal attack. >These were the days of the board computers, where one could easily spend 1.800 >US Dollars on a purchase - bought as trusted / believed / wished.....updates ? >Questionable..... >so, one COULD have undestood the intention of such an owner, who felt personally >affected - that this, his beloved - and expensive tresure case might not be as >good as...... >when I look back into my archives, the postings - LETTERS ( ! ) at that time >were of quite high quality - not just personal, ridiculous attacks, nope - the >" affected " tried to give proof of his " darling's " quality by games >( analyzed !! ) - test positions + so on. >So, this was.... >today we reached a stadium, where we need Moderators - for people who react as >if they're out of the gutter, just because they don't get the applause they >recommend for their opinions. >To make it as cheap as possible : >I, myself, like the CM alot - as everyboby knows, and I like Marty's MCP + Ed's >releases. >Sometimes I'm really happy, when I - or in cooperation with comrades like >Harald, - find new settings or such. >So one wants to share this with the comrades - here. >Result ( suggested ) : personal attacks.......... >what's this, we're discussing about ? Easy to detect - we're all grown up's - so >- >everybody should - must know, how to behave. Not a chance to get through with >such an often herein seen behaviour in real life - so, why in CCC - becuase it's >" just usenet " , eh ? >Instead of blocking this, and I mean it, there seems to be a debate, if an >attack is not that harsh, not that ugly, better please by private...... >this is ridiculous to me. >If a someone doesn't behave as expected - for me the show for this gent should >be over - for good. >This for the CM + other " heatened " postings. >A thread like " Mr. Takata - a weak master " - or however - is insane ! >Besides the fact, that a master is a master and got a fine reputation - prooved, >BTW - how come anybody can dare to set up this here and the folks discuss to >remove such an evil thing.......or not ? >There have been comebacks of gents recently - where I can just shake my head - >I'm just a user - but we got a spoken word, here in Germany : >" You're gonna get exactly them ghots, you're shoutin' for " > >ELVIS I wouldn't have found better words; absolutely correct.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.