Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: CM 6555 vs CM6000-4

Author: Harald Faber

Date: 03:40:46 12/14/98

Go up one level in this thread


On December 14, 1998 at 06:20:11, Mark Young wrote:

>>>>>>Pentium 200MMX, 30 min/game, standard Hash table size (by mistake, as I forgot
>>>>>>to change this back after I reinstalled Chessmaster). 44 games played
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                 W     L     D      Score
>>>>>>CM 6555         16    11    17      24.5
>>>>>>CM 6000-4       11    16    17      19.5
>>>>>>
>>>>>>CM6555 still looks to be the best.

Not so quickly. You are all only testing the CM versions against each other.
This is by far not nearly the same as playing other opponents.

>Sure, I test programs everyday. I have a spare computer I can help test settings
>on. Lets get some people together, and chose some settings to test.

Enter the following participants in your tourney:
1) CM6000 original with 32MB hash, you know how to do it, selectivity=10
2) CM6555, also 32MB hash, not sure which book to use
3) Rebel10a
4) MCP8
5) Hiarcs6/7
6) Junior5
7) Fritz5.32

Setup is 40/2h. At least 4 games each pairing, better will be 20 games (10xwhite
and 10xblack) if you have the time to do this. It will last a while but then
we'll get an impression. I'd advice to start playing
1) CM-Junior  (maybe we can count the results of the 12 games that were
published here but I can't remember the time control)
2) CM-Hiarcs6
3) CM-Fritz5
4) CM-MCP8
5) CM-Rebel10
So there has to be at least 5 volunteers, better would be 10 (seperated
white/black). Step forward please. :-)



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.