Author: Harald Faber
Date: 04:43:13 12/14/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 14, 1998 at 07:07:30, Didzis Cirulis wrote: >>Enter the following participants in your tourney: >>1) CM6000 original with 32MB hash, you know how to do it, selectivity=10 >>2) CM6555, also 32MB hash, not sure which book to use >>3) Rebel10a >>4) MCP8 >>5) Hiarcs6/7 >>6) Junior5 >>7) Fritz5.32 >> >>Setup is 40/2h. At least 4 games each pairing, better will be 20 games (10xwhite >>and 10xblack) if you have the time to do this. It will last a while but then >>we'll get an impression. I'd advice to start playing >>1) CM-Junior (maybe we can count the results of the 12 games that were >>published here but I can't remember the time control) >>2) CM-Hiarcs6 >>3) CM-Fritz5 >>4) CM-MCP8 >>5) CM-Rebel10 >>So there has to be at least 5 volunteers, better would be 10 (seperated >>white/black). Step forward please. :-) > >OK, this is already something! I could play CM vs Fritz 5.16 (I wish I had money >for 5.32 :( ), MCP 8 and Rebel 10. May main problem is I have only one 200MMX >PC with 32MB RAM, therefore I usually give both programs 8MB hash. How do my >results fit together with those played on two separate computers, I don't know. Hmm. Keeping in mind that pemanent brain is not unimportant I should have added "...playing on 2 PCs...". Personally I don't trust games played on one computer because one never knows in how far each program uses CPU and how much it profits from p.b. >But I consider them fair, as I do special calculations for this purpose. Would you specify this? >If I remember right, CM vs Junior is difficult to play as CM takes too much of >processor power, and Junior calculates serveral times slower. I have Hiarcs 6 >module only. This is a different story anyway because you don't have the original Hiarcs book with the original move preferences.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.