Author: martin fierz
Date: 22:03:14 04/14/04
Go up one level in this thread
On April 14, 2004 at 19:55:15, Dave Gomboc wrote: >On April 14, 2004 at 19:05:25, martin fierz wrote: > >>why are you defending yourself? i didn't suggest that doing SMP was a bad idea. >>i just said that it's natural that *you* are doing SMP as a university >>professor, because it is an interesting field for academic research (as opposed >>to tweaking evaluation functions), and it has practical applications for any >>software engineer who wants to learn about using multiple processors for complex >>tasks. and the commercials will follow suit once SMP is in everybodys PC. >> >>cheers >> martin > >...as opposed to tweaking evaluation functions.... what?!?!? :-) :-) hehehe - i find it fair to stick with my statement. tweaking eval functions is not of general interest to the average computer science student. multiprocessing should be... cheers martin >(http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?359900) > >Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.