Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Real stupid sacrifice of Fritz5.16(Is Fritz5.32 better?)

Author: James T. Walker

Date: 05:50:25 12/14/98

Go up one level in this thread

On December 14, 1998 at 01:27:53, blass uri wrote:

>r1r3k1/pp3p2/4p1p1/3pP1Np/b1q2P2/P3Q3/1PPR2PP/1KR5 b - - 0 1
>
>Fritz5.16 finds at depth 13 the stupid sacrifice  21...b5
>Fritz needs a long time to find this mistake.
>
>can fritz5.32 find a better move at depthes 13,14?
>
>Uri
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Hello Uri,
I ran this on my computer and it takes a long to get to the 13th ply.  The move
.....b5 showed up as 13 of 41 in the 13th ply and was analyzed for a second and
skipped.  Which version of Fritz do you have.  I'm running the 5.16 version.
It's still planning 1....Qc5 (0.38) at the start of the 14th ply.
Jim Walker

• Re: Real stupid sacrifice of Fritz5.16(Is Fritz5.32 better?) blass uri 11:01:57 12/14/98
  • Re: Real stupid sacrifice of Fritz5.16(Is Fritz5.32 better?) blass uri 11:43:08 12/14/98
    • Re: Real stupid sacrifice of Fritz5.16(Is Fritz5.32 better?) James T. Walker 16:21:05 12/14/98
• Re: Real stupid sacrifice of Fritz5.16(Is Fritz5.32 better?) Harald Faber 07:55:25 12/14/98

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.