Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Computer/Brain implants, soon we can all be GM's

Author: margolies,marc

Date: 05:03:45 04/15/04

Go up one level in this thread


'hofmann' is not spelled that way, incidently.
a lexical analysis of your posting indicates that you once called yourself
gcruse.
keep sending attack samples--I need them to find you.
-marc

On April 15, 2004 at 07:10:18, Bryan Hofmann wrote:

>On April 14, 2004 at 17:15:45, margolies,marc wrote:
>
>>the caption of chris's introduction to the link, which is what makes it germane
>>to this board, about brain implants creating gm-s, completely paralels the
>>chessbase spoof of last year in tone.
>>no judgement is made in my post about the appropriateness of an fda approved
>>human-subject experiment.
>>
>>your repeated attempts to distort my writings, and inability to remain on-point
>>strongly indicate that my first judgement about you is correct after all.
>>
>>does bryan hofman==brian thomas?
>
>As I predicted you resorted to your inane detective accusations. I have no idea
>if  bryan hofman==brian Thomas but bryan hofman is not bryan hofmann. As I
>suggested before, perhaps you should focus on English skills rather than your
>rather schlock detective skills.
>
>
>>
>>
>>On April 14, 2004 at 10:49:52, Bryan Hofmann wrote:
>>
>>>On April 14, 2004 at 09:45:16, margolies,marc wrote:
>>>
>>>>news stories are always about implants as input devices, like keyboards, but
>>>>using brainwaves or eye motion, etc.
>>>>hoaxes are always about the CNS (central nervous system) recieving digital
>>>>electronic data directly and parsing it-- this was the speculative fiction of
>>>>the poster's caption and chessbase's humour.
>>>>I am sorry I answered you so harshly.
>>>>-Marc
>>>>
>>>
>>>I have no idea what your are talking about here.... You respond to Chris' post
>>>stating that it is a April Fools joke from Chess Base; The two have nothing in
>>>common as the story from Chess Base is utter nonsense (BTW I had already found
>>>the Chess Base item before I posted so your first return comment is also out
>>>there). In my comment to you I was just pointing out that the two had nothing to
>>>do with each other countering your statement that they were.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>On April 14, 2004 at 08:30:05, margolies,marc wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>hofmman, you are argumentative and lazy.
>>>>>http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=882
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>On April 14, 2004 at 05:28:17, Bryan Hofmann wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On April 13, 2004 at 22:46:49, margolies,marc wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>hi chris,
>>>>>>>please search the chessbase server because that was the april fool's story a
>>>>>>>year ago ;-)
>>>>>>>marc
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I don't recall Chessbase being an authority on FDA approved products perhaps you
>>>>>>should broaden your horizons abit
>>>>>>http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&edition=us&q=Cyberkinetics&btnG=Search+News. I
>>>>>>doubt that the Associated Press (who released this) or the several other well
>>>>>>known publications would play a childish stunt.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.