Author: Micheal Cummings
Date: 06:36:51 12/14/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 14, 1998 at 09:27:18, Harald Faber wrote: >On December 14, 1998 at 09:23:53, Kai Skibbe wrote: > >>>>for Rebel10 and CM6000 this worked just fine. I have calculated a factor of >>>>about 1.3 for Rebel10. So I play these two programs with 60min/game for CM6000 >>>>and 75min/game for Rebel10. >>>>Junior has a factor of about 3.6 and Fritz5.32 a factor of about 8. So I decided >>>>to play with Rebel10 first to get a first impression of the strength of CM6000. >>>>Kai >>> >>>Are you playing the orignal CM6k with sel.10? How many games? >> >>I have only played the normal CM6k. After 9 games CM6k leads by 5-4 (+2 =6 -1). > >Normal means with 1MB hash? > >>Now I am playing Rebel10 against the Cummings-Settings. After 3 games CM6k >leads by 3-0. CM6k has all three games won with white. >>The next weeks I have not much time to test CM6k any further,because of a new >>winboard tournament. > >A pity because CM6k won't go further winning 100%... :-) Good to hear, the settings you have their are better than the standard settings in CM6K inmy testing. So things look promising for CM6K here. As I have said in another post, I believe I have even stronger settings than those. So with more testing, if things are still going great I will post them and send them to you so you may try them at your own time. And see if they are better.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.