Author: Harald Faber
Date: 06:55:31 12/14/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 14, 1998 at 09:50:26, Didzis Cirulis wrote: >>>>2) engine1.00-engine1.02 is far from engine1.00-opp and engine1.02-opp. >>> >>>Agreed completly! I remember me testing Chess Tiger 11.5. It played equal >>>against Fritz 5 and the next was CM5555. And you can imagine my face when CM5555 >>>got 0.5 of 4 possible points only. :-) >>>Didzis >> >>Sorry, misunderstanding; I meant e.g. Tiger 11.2-11.5 comparing to Tiger11.2 vs >>opp and Tiger 11.5 vs opp. > >No misunderstanding at all! :-) I meant the following: in CM tournaments it was >found that CM5555 is something great. But facing the opponent "outside of >Chessmaster" this CM5555 got defeated. Your point, as I took it, was that by >chessmaster tournaments one can select a real Anti-CM monster, but it may not be >ready to face someone like Chess Tiger. Or it may play weaker then standard >Chessmaster. Sure the only way out is to select that Monster AND send in the >battle vs other top programs. ...and be disappointed by the result. ;-))) Seriously I think it is more effective to do some testing on positions than testing CMa-vs-CMb.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.