Author: Francois Bertin
Date: 08:23:40 12/14/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 14, 1998 at 10:23:20, James T. Walker wrote:
>On December 13, 1998 at 20:14:16, Francois Bertin wrote:
>>Hi! I am currently looking around to replace my old and trusty P100.
>>I am interested by the AMD K6-300 or 350.
>>
>>Does anyone know how much positions per second Rebel 10 typically
>>does on that kind of processor. Also, does having a L2 cache of 1024K
>>instead of 512K has any significant impact on performance with Rebel?
>>
>>And what about the Celeron 300A, which also seems to be
>>a good alternative?
>Hello Francois,
>I have an AMD K6-2 @350 Mhz with 512K cache. Its hard to give you a NPS since
>it not only varies with the position but varies from 1 second to the next with
>the same position. Here is a position I used to give you some figures.
>
>1b2r3/5k1p/BRb3pB/8/4P3/5P2/8/7K b - - 0 1
> BM Rxe4
>Rebel 10a on my K6-2 @ 350 Mhz I timed it for 5 minutes and calculated an
>average of 118 KNPS. On my Pentium II @333 Mhz the same 5 minutes averaged
>100 KNPS. Of course I've seen higher and lower values throughout a whole game.
Thanks for the figures, Jim. Your K6-2 350 must really scream
when analyzing :-) On my P100, on average the pos/sec I get when
examining a position is around 30,000...
You state that your system has 512K of L2 cache. Do you think
Rebel would perform better with 1024K in the same task?
Kind regards,
Francois Bertin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.