Author: Stefan Meyer-Kahlen
Date: 10:49:34 04/17/04
Go up one level in this thread
On April 16, 2004 at 12:54:41, Daniel Mehrmannn wrote: >On April 16, 2004 at 03:43:39, Stefan Meyer-Kahlen wrote: > >> >> >>Hello Daniel, >> >>sorry, I don't quite understand your posting. Do you mean that I should have >>published it earlier? Well, the protocol is still pretty new. >> >>Stefan > >hi Stefan, > >sure, that was the point. I heard a lot of information about a upcoming UCI 2.0. >Dieter told me about a download page shredderchess.de. I only find a txtfile >with new function but no public announcement about this new features. > >So i was a little bit angry about new (unknown) UCI version or modification, >without any announcement :( >I remember what happend with the wb protocol the last years. > >But its okay. I should wait for a real announcement, that you made, and not >listing to other people which told me some stuff. > >By the way, good job Stefan. THe UCI will be better and better :) > >Thanks to Dieter too, he explain that new features very good :) (And the >reasons) We discussed all the features for quite a while. The whole process took much more time and work than I expected. I didn't want to publish any specification which was not finished to avoid confusion. Stefan
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.