Author: Graham Banks
Date: 03:36:38 04/18/04
Go up one level in this thread
On April 18, 2004 at 03:50:04, Derek Paquette wrote: >Most disturbing is the result of hiarcs9 in this tournament aswell as others, >Since you have looked through or viewed most of the games, I wonder if you can >say, or even speculate on what you've viewed the reason for hiarcs9 bad >performances, > >endgame? middlegame? >too tactical? too positional, etc etc, > Hard to pinpoint really. I think that Hiarcs 9 is too one dimensional (positional) and it is just being outplayed. Small sample of games too, so there is always room for an unfortunate string of results. This is a strong field though. One shouldn't underestimate any of the programs in this field. The free programs often don't get tested by people at longer time controls, yet that is often where their real strength lies.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.