Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Real stupid sacrifice of Fritz5.16(Is Fritz5.32 better?)

Author: blass uri

Date: 11:01:57 12/14/98

Go up one level in this thread



On December 14, 1998 at 08:50:25, James T. Walker wrote:

>On December 14, 1998 at 01:27:53, blass uri wrote:
>
>>r1r3k1/pp3p2/4p1p1/3pP1Np/b1q2P2/P3Q3/1PPR2PP/1KR5 b - - 0 1
>>
>>Fritz5.16 finds at depth 13 the stupid sacrifice  21...b5
>>Fritz needs a long time to find this mistake.
>>
>>can fritz5.32 find a better move at depthes 13,14?
>>
>>Uri
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>Hello Uri,
>I ran this on my computer and it takes a long to get to the 13th ply.
  The move
>.....b5 showed up as 13 of 41 in the 13th ply and was analyzed for a second and
>skipped.  Which version of Fritz do you have.  I'm running the 5.16 version.
>It's still planning 1....Qc5 (0.38) at the start of the 14th ply.
>Jim Walker

I ran Fritz5.16 as an engine for fritz5 with 64 Mbytes hash tables
I waited some hours and it did not change its mind at depthes 14,15

I remember that the evaluation of Qc5 was less optimistic at depth 13

The reason may be that I gave it all the game and not only the position.
I will try to give it only the position without all the game

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.