Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 06:51:54 04/19/04
Go up one level in this thread
On April 19, 2004 at 08:06:16, Steve Maughan wrote: >John, > >>>However, back to my main point - IMHO 99.999% of Winboard / UCI engines are >>>not that concerned about making a weak engine (I'm certainly not) - so >>>hopefully we can get some dialogue going and share some ideas. > >>Fair enough. But if you are "not that concerned" about making a weak engine, >>then why are you interested in supporting this feature? Just as an exercise? >>Or are you only interested in discussing how it would be done? > >Since Monarch has <1% of going commercial the whole project is mainly an >interlectual exercise. I just thought that this area may be one with less >programmer secrecy and therefore more openness - maybe I was wrong. > >Regards, > >Steve Yes you are wrong. This even though weakening an engine when putting effort into it really is a peanut :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.