Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 09:08:27 04/19/04
Go up one level in this thread
On April 19, 2004 at 00:59:45, Graham Banks wrote: >On April 18, 2004 at 13:14:12, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On April 17, 2004 at 08:01:14, Graham Banks wrote: >> >>>Small sample I know. Might try another 10 to see if the gap widens! >>> >>>CM9000 R1 6.0 >>>CM9000 Judge 4.0 >> >> >>"small sample" doesn't do it justice. 10 games is random noise. Play a 100 >>game match, then look at groups of 10 consecutive games. You might find 10-0 or >>0-10 or anywhere in the middle, even though the result ends up at 50-50. > > >You're correct Bob - I will try to play 50 games, but that will be it! >Graham. Note that all I was mentioning was the futility of drawing _any_ conclusion from 10 games. You mentioned that the "gap might widen". I was pointing out that after 10 games there was really no meaningful gap to widen or narrow. :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.