Author: blass uri
Date: 11:43:08 12/14/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 14, 1998 at 14:01:57, blass uri wrote: > >On December 14, 1998 at 08:50:25, James T. Walker wrote: > >>On December 14, 1998 at 01:27:53, blass uri wrote: >> >>>r1r3k1/pp3p2/4p1p1/3pP1Np/b1q2P2/P3Q3/1PPR2PP/1KR5 b - - 0 1 >>> >>>Fritz5.16 finds at depth 13 the stupid sacrifice 21...b5 >>>Fritz needs a long time to find this mistake. >>> >>>can fritz5.32 find a better move at depthes 13,14? >>> >>>Uri >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>Hello Uri, >>I ran this on my computer and it takes a long to get to the 13th ply. > The move >>.....b5 showed up as 13 of 41 in the 13th ply and was analyzed for a second and >>skipped. Which version of Fritz do you have. I'm running the 5.16 version. >>It's still planning 1....Qc5 (0.38) at the start of the 14th ply. >>Jim Walker > >I ran Fritz5.16 as an engine for fritz5 with 64 Mbytes hash tables >I waited some hours and it did not change its mind at depthes 14,15 > >I remember that the evaluation of Qc5 was less optimistic at depth 13 > >The reason may be that I gave it all the game and not only the position. >I will try to give it only the position without all the game > >Uri I gave fritz5 the position without all the game My fritz5's evaluation is 0.47 at depth 13 b5 is the 10th move out of 41 and it evaluates b5 at depth 13 as 0.44 pawns for white Maybe the problem is that I use windows95 and not windows98 Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.