Author: David Horn
Date: 13:10:13 12/14/98
Go up one level in this thread
John Szasz III <--- AMEN !! Laurence Chen <--- Please reconsider your exit. You used too broad a brush in your ahh "critique" posting. There were some who were lurking and have only come to the fore since you present a stimulating factual discussion that's been absent for a spell here. blass uri <--- If you take umbrage at Laurence Chen's comments or "loose" statements regarding CM then rise to his challenge in the manner as Thom Perry 13:48:49 12/14/98,F. Jermann 13:21:02 12/14/98,Soren Riis 13:38:20 12/14/98 have. I.E. cite some authority or game examples or results from engine experiments to refute his assertions.I've played this fellow now and again and sometimes--- on a really good day --- I can catch him napping. (Although, he seems to have that "bad habit" of reviewing what I've done and I've never caught him twice with the same ruse. ) Lanny DiBartolomeo <--- Make some allowance for "out of sequence posting". If John kennedy had responed to the strongly agressive message that arrived delayed after the more concilatory one then the October crises might have ended most unpleasently.( I just caught a glimse of your followon post) All <--- If you quote many lines of an original post,embed your commentary,are inturn are quoted by another doing the same then is not long before it gets confusing as to who said what. Espeacially if the embedded remarks are mis-quotes and exaggerations. Rabbit Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.