Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 09:15:02 04/21/04
Go up one level in this thread
On April 20, 2004 at 15:22:52, Andrew Williams wrote: >On April 19, 2004 at 22:50:56, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On April 19, 2004 at 15:49:14, Andrew Williams wrote: >> >>>On April 18, 2004 at 19:56:25, Andrew Wagner wrote: >>> >>>Try searching longer. PM is getting this at ply 27 (78kns, 0.76 seconds) at the >>>moment, although I've seen it return the correct move at various different plies >>>over the years. >>> >>>Andrew >> >>Something might be wrong. It is a 26 ply combination to win a pawn, with no >>hash table at all... Hashing usually lets us hit the solution quicker. IE >>Crafty typically solves it at depth=18... >> >> > >Thanks for pointing this out, Bob. My TT seems OK, but my ETTC looks dodgy. >Without it, PM has this at ply 21, which is the same as the version before the >latest major overhaul of the TT in PostModernist. I'll have to have a look at >that ETTC thing soon. > >Cheers > >Andrew Williams It might well be OK. It is possible that ETC is making you search things in a better order, which in this case, delays seeing the solution...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.