Author: Detlef Pordzik
Date: 16:04:51 12/14/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 14, 1998 at 17:42:14, Will Singleton wrote: > >On December 14, 1998 at 17:12:11, Peter Kappler wrote: > >> >>Am I the only person getting tired of the flood of Chessmaster 6000 posts? >> >>Without actually counting, I would estimate that 30-40% of the posts made in the >>past two weeks have been related to CM6000. >> >>I realize that this is the "Computer Chess Club" and that these posts are >>certainly not off-topic, but just as with Usenet newsgroups, when one forum gets >>too large, it is logical to split the discussion into sub-groups. >> >>So my plea to the people who maintaing this site is this: if the % of CM6000 >>content continues at this level, would you please consider making a sub-group >>for Chessmaster posts? >> >>Of course, I am interested in what other people think about this idea... >> >>--Peter >> >> >>P.S. I'd also love a sub-group for computer chess *programming*. Finding the >>programming posts on CCC has turned into a "needle in the haystack" experience. > > >Peter, > >I would have to say that, as you indicate, the CM posts are certainly on-topic, >even though I don't read them. > >I would oppose the idea of actually splitting the posts, since that might tend >to diminish and fractionalize the whole. The current format has proved pretty >successful. And, you know, the focus of the group tends to shift around, as >various threads expire. > >Will I think, this is just, what the forus is here for. Today CM 6.000 - tomorrow Genius 6; that's all great to me ! I'm happy with anything, related to chess......it avoids threads like " the weak master " and other crap. Open a thread, which you'd like to be discussed - and voila - gonna see - the thing starts to " live " , as well..... ELVIS
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.