Author: Oliver Y.
Date: 18:34:49 12/14/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 14, 1998 at 19:26:18, James T. Walker wrote: >On December 14, 1998 at 11:23:40, Francois Bertin wrote: > >>On December 14, 1998 at 10:23:20, James T. Walker wrote: >> >>>On December 13, 1998 at 20:14:16, Francois Bertin wrote: >> >>>>Hi! I am currently looking around to replace my old and trusty P100. >>>>I am interested by the AMD K6-300 or 350. >>>> >>>>Does anyone know how much positions per second Rebel 10 typically >>>>does on that kind of processor. Also, does having a L2 cache of 1024K >>>>instead of 512K has any significant impact on performance with Rebel? >>>> >>>>And what about the Celeron 300A, which also seems to be >>>>a good alternative? >> >>>Hello Francois, >>>I have an AMD K6-2 @350 Mhz with 512K cache. Its hard to give you a NPS since >>>it not only varies with the position but varies from 1 second to the next with >>>the same position. Here is a position I used to give you some figures. >>> >>>1b2r3/5k1p/BRb3pB/8/4P3/5P2/8/7K b - - 0 1 >>> BM Rxe4 >>>Rebel 10a on my K6-2 @ 350 Mhz I timed it for 5 minutes and calculated an >>>average of 118 KNPS. On my Pentium II @333 Mhz the same 5 minutes averaged >>>100 KNPS. Of course I've seen higher and lower values throughout a whole game. >> >> Thanks for the figures, Jim. Your K6-2 350 must really scream >>when analyzing :-) On my P100, on average the pos/sec I get when >>examining a position is around 30,000... >> >> You state that your system has 512K of L2 cache. Do you think >>Rebel would perform better with 1024K in the same task? >> >> Kind regards, >> Francois Bertin >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >Hello again Francois, >I'm sorry but I can't answer that. It's out of my expertise ! We had this >discussion about a month ago with Bob Hyatt and a few others. I think the >botton line was it would not help a lot. I tried to get one with 1 meg L2 cache >but ended up taking the "Best price" I could find and skipped the extra cache. If I recall correctly, few people could get their hands on the overclockable Celeron chip. Intel made this impossible once they learned of it, perhaps from or via http://tomshardware.com
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.