Author: Yar
Date: 05:41:33 04/24/04
Go up one level in this thread
Analysis by Shredder 8 (Athlon 2600+). After 6 hours 29 min (depth 20/58): 1. +- (5.40): rd7+ 2. +- (4.91): rb8 Yar On April 24, 2004 at 04:02:30, Vincent Lejeune wrote: >On April 24, 2004 at 03:40:22, Vincent Lejeune wrote: > >>Shredder 8 is not convinced at all that Rd7+ is the best moves ; 2-best moves >>after 10 min (AMD 2800+) >> >> >>Analysis by Shredder 8: >> >>1. +- (4.42): 1.Tb8 Dxf2 2.Fxf2 Txf2 3.Cg8+ Rd7 4.Rg1 Txg2+ 5.Rf1 Tg3 6.De5 Txh3 >>7.Cf6+ Re7 8.Cd5+ Fxd5 9.Dxd5 b5 10.Tb6 >>2. +- (3.83): 1.Td7+ Fxd7 2.Cd5+ Re8 3.Df6 Cg7 4.Fe5 Dxe5+ 5.Dxe5+ Fe6 6.Db8+ >>Rd7 7.Dxb7+ Rd6 8.Ce3 Txf2 9.Db4+ Re5 10.Dc3+ Re4 11.Cc2 > >After 35 min, both rise (depth 17/52): >Analysis by Shredder 8: > >1. +- (4.67): 1.Tb8 Dxf2 2.Fxf2 Txf2 3.Cg8+ Rd7 4.Rg1 Txg2+ 5.Rf1 Tg3 6.De5 Txh3 >7.Cf6+ Re7 8.Cd5+ Fxd5 9.Dxd5 b5 10.Db7+ Rf6 11.Dxa6 Rg6 12.Rg2 >2. +- (4.49): 1.Td7+ Fxd7 2.Cd5+ Re8 3.Df6 Cg7 4.Fe5 Dxe5+ 5.Dxe5+ Fe6 6.Db8+ >Rd7 7.Dxb7+ Rd6 8.Ce3 Txf2 9.Db4+ Re5 10.Cg4+ Fxg4 11.Dc5+ Re6 12.De3+ Rd5 >13.Dxf2 Fh5 14.Da2+ Rc5 15.Dc2+ > > >>On April 24, 2004 at 01:04:55, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>On April 24, 2004 at 00:29:54, Lei , Shiann-Tzong wrote: >>> >>>>[D]3R4/1p2kp2/p1b1nN2/6p1/8/6BP/2r1qPPK/Q7 w KQkq - 0 1 >>>> >>>> Rd7+ >>> >>>Crafty output: >>> >>>White(1): go >>> clearing hash tables >>> time surplus 0.00 time limit 16:39 (16:39) >>> depth time score variation (1) >>> 6 0.24 0.28 1. Rb8 Rb2 2. Ng8+ Kd7 3. Qa5 Rd2 4. >>> Qf5 Qh5 >>> 6-> 0.57 0.28 1. Rb8 Rb2 2. Ng8+ Kd7 3. Qa5 Rd2 4. >>> Qf5 Qh5 >>> 7 0.83 +1 1. Rb8!! >>> 7 0.99 0.66 1. Rb8 Rb2 2. Ng8+ Kd7 3. Qa3 Nf4 4. >>> Qf8 Bd5 5. Qc8+ Kd6 6. Nf6 >>> 7-> 1.76 0.66 1. Rb8 Rb2 2. Ng8+ Kd7 3. Qa3 Nf4 4. >>> Qf8 Bd5 5. Qc8+ Kd6 6. Nf6 >>> 8 2.77 +1 1. Rb8!! >>> 8 3.56 1.18 1. Rb8 Rb2 2. Ng8+ Kd7 3. Qa3 Nf4 4. >>> Qf8 Be4 5. Qxf7+ Kc6 6. Bxf4 gxf4 7. >>> Qxf4 >>> 8-> 5.33 1.18 1. Rb8 Rb2 2. Ng8+ Kd7 3. Qa3 Nf4 4. >>> Qf8 Be4 5. Qxf7+ Kc6 6. Bxf4 gxf4 7. >>> Qxf4 >>> 9 9.30 +1 1. Rb8!! >>> 9 12.44 1.75 1. Rb8 Rb2 2. Ng8+ Kd7 3. Qa3 Nf4 4. >>> Qf8 Qe5 5. Qd8+ Ke6 6. Qe7+ Kf5 7. >>> Qxf7+ Ke4 8. Rd8 >>> 9-> 17.49 1.75 1. Rb8 Rb2 2. Ng8+ Kd7 3. Qa3 Nf4 4. >>> Qf8 Qe5 5. Qd8+ Ke6 6. Qe7+ Kf5 7. >>> Qxf7+ Ke4 8. Rd8 >>> 10 27.38 1.83 1. Rb8 Rb2 2. Ng8+ Kd7 3. Qa3 Nf4 4. >>> Qa5 Nd5 5. Qd8+ Ke6 6. Qd6+ Kf5 7. >>> Nh6+ Ke4 8. Nxf7 Kf5 9. Nh6+ Ke4 10. >>> Qg6+ Kd4 11. Nf5+ Kc5 12. Qxg5 >>> 10 43.23 +1 1. Rd7+!! >>> 10 47.20 2.15 1. Rd7+ Bxd7 2. Nd5+ Ke8 3. Qf6 Ng7 >>> 4. Be5 Qxe5+ 5. Qxe5+ Be6 6. Ne3 f6 >>> 7. Qb8+ Rc8 8. Qxb7 Kf8 9. Qxa6 >>> 10-> 57.37 2.15 1. Rd7+ Bxd7 2. Nd5+ Ke8 3. Qf6 Ng7 >>> 4. Be5 Qxe5+ 5. Qxe5+ Be6 6. Ne3 f6 >>> 7. Qb8+ Rc8 8. Qxb7 Kf8 9. Qxa6 >>> 11 1:06 2.35 1. Rd7+ Bxd7 2. Nd5+ Ke8 3. Qf6 Ng7 >>> 4. Be5 Qxe5+ 5. Qxe5+ Be6 6. Qb8+ Kd7 >>> 7. Qxb7+ Kd6 8. Qxa6+ Rc6 9. Nb6 Kc7 >>> 10. Qa1 Rxb6 11. Qxg7 >>> 11-> 1:35 2.35 1. Rd7+ Bxd7 2. Nd5+ Ke8 3. Qf6 Ng7 >>> 4. Be5 Qxe5+ 5. Qxe5+ Be6 6. Qb8+ Kd7 >>> 7. Qxb7+ Kd6 8. Qxa6+ Rc6 9. Nb6 Kc7 >>> 10. Qa1 Rxb6 11. Qxg7 >>> 12 2:02 2.41 1. Rd7+ Bxd7 2. Nd5+ Ke8 3. Qf6 Ng7 >>> 4. Be5 Qxe5+ 5. Qxe5+ Be6 6. Qb8+ Kd7 >>> 7. Qxb7+ Kd6 8. Qxa6+ Rc6 9. Nb6 Nf5 >>> 10. Qd3+ Ke5 11. Qb5+ Kd6 >>> 12-> 8:15 2.41 1. Rd7+ Bxd7 2. Nd5+ Ke8 3. Qf6 Ng7 >>> 4. Be5 Qxe5+ 5. Qxe5+ Be6 6. Qb8+ Kd7 >>> 7. Qxb7+ Kd6 8. Qxa6+ Rc6 9. Nb6 Nf5 >>> 10. Qd3+ Ke5 11. Qb5+ Kd6 >>> 13 10:02 2.41 1. Rd7+ Bxd7 2. Nd5+ Ke8 3. Qf6 Ng7 >>> 4. Be5 Qxe5+ 5. Qxe5+ Be6 6. Qb8+ Kd7 >>> 7. Qxb7+ Kd6 8. Qxa6+ Rc6 9. Nb6 Nf5 >>> 10. Qd3+ Ke5 11. Qb5+ Kd6 12. Kg1 >>> time=16:39 cpu=93% mat=-1 n=449634292 fh=94% nps=450K >>> ext-> chk=36087530 cap=836898 pp=3264 1rep=1970007 mate=182930 >>> predicted=0 nodes=449634292 evals=120052957 50move=0 >>> endgame tablebase-> probes=0 hits=0
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.