Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: CSVN Leiden: What is wrong with c5c4 or d5d4 ?

Author: Christophe Theron

Date: 17:47:28 04/24/04

Go up one level in this thread


On April 24, 2004 at 18:47:10, Jorge Pichard wrote:

>On April 24, 2004 at 15:16:43, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>On April 24, 2004 at 14:50:18, Uri Blass wrote:
>>
>>>On April 24, 2004 at 13:06:18, Djordje Vidanovic wrote:
>>>
>>><snipped>
>>>>Tiger played just like a human.  Exploited the immobility of the opponent's rook
>>>>with uncanny, almost human, understanding...  I like Tiger a lot.
>>>>
>>>>Djordje
>>>
>>>I suspect that cxb4 is also a search problem and Isichess did not search deep
>>>enough.
>>>
>>>Of course it is possible to solve everything by better evaluation but as you
>>>said search is also knowledge.
>>>
>>>Here is some search of movei(p850,32 mbytes hash).
>>>
>>>Movei needs a long time to avoid cxb4 but I doubt if the laternative that it
>>>finds is better(it is not the Rh4 move that was suggested by Kurt).
>>>
>>>[D]7R/p1k4p/6p1/1ppp3r/1P6/2P4P/P4PP1/6K1 b - - 0 1
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Chess Tiger switches from cxb4 to Rh4 in 1min 54s (ply depth 16) on my P3M-933
>>(6Mb hash).
>>
>>
>>
>>    Christophe
>
>What is wrong with c5c4 or d5d4 ?



To be honest, I don't know. It looks like avoiding cxb4 is important, but I do
not know what other move should be played (I'm not an expert at chess).



    Christophe



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.