Author: Uri Blass
Date: 10:29:26 04/25/04
Go up one level in this thread
On April 25, 2004 at 11:05:14, Alessandro Damiani wrote: >On April 25, 2004 at 06:53:39, Eduard Nemeth wrote: > >>On April 25, 2004 at 06:47:21, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >> >>No Jorge, see here: >> >> >>Ruffian 2.1.0 - Shredder, real position: >> >> >>[D]6Q1/8/p7/7p/8/5q2/5k2/2K5 w - - 0 1 >> >>Is this won with 6-Pieces? I belive no >>then the pawn on a6 is not possible in the endgame >> >>(Ruffian 2.1.0 has not 6 pieces, but Shredder have it). >> >>Position without pawn a5: >> >>[D]6Q1/8/8/7p/8/5q2/5k2/2K5 w - - 0 63 >> >> >>Draw: >> >>1. = (0.00): 63.Dd8 >>2. -+ (-#76): 63.Da2+ >> >>But Ruffian (without 6-Pieces) plays Qa2+? and lost. :( >> >>Here won also not the engine, it won the better EGTB, or? :) > >EGTB are part of the engine. So, the better engine won. > >Alessandro EGTB are part of the thing that played chess. The question is if they are part of the engine is dependent on the definition of the word engine. They were probably not important in the relevant game. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.