Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 13:57:50 04/25/04
Go up one level in this thread
On April 25, 2004 at 16:01:57, John Merlino wrote: >On April 25, 2004 at 15:42:37, Drexel,Michael wrote: > >>On April 25, 2004 at 08:51:54, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>>[Event "CSVN"] >>>>[Site "Leiden"] >>>>[Date "2004.04.25"] >>>>[Round "8"] >>>>[White "The King"] >>>>[Black "Shredder"] >>>>[Result "*"] >>>>[ECO "B52"] >>>>[Annotator "thstorm"] >>>>[PlyCount "58"] >>>>[EventDate "2004.??.??"] >>>> >>>>1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. Bb5+ Bd7 4. Bxd7+ Qxd7 5. c4 Nc6 6. Nc3 Nf6 7. O-O g6 8. >>>>Rb1 Bg7 9. a3 O-O 10. b4 Ng4 11. Nd5 e6 12. Ne3 Nge5 13. Nxe5 dxe5 14. b5 Nd4 >>>>15. Nc2 Rad8 16. Nxd4 Qxd4 17. Qc2 Qd3 18. Rb2 Qe2 19. d3 Qxc2 20. Rxc2 Rxd3 >>>>21. a4 f5 22. f3 Kf7 23. Bb2 Rfd8 24. Re1 f4 25. a5 g5 26. Kf2 h5 27. h3 Kf6 >>>>28. Rc3 Rd2+ 29. Re2 R2d4 * >>> >>> Hi Eduard >>> Shredder will surely win this game I think. Not very convincinly >>> played by The King. >>> Kurt & Rolf Chess: http://www.utzingerkurt.com >>> Kurt >> >>Hi Kurt, >> >>this game was a disaster for The King. >>It's the game Salov-Shirov Madrid 1996 0-1 (32) >> >>Michael > >Indeed, at least all the way up through 20...Rxd3. But, just in case you were >thinking it, this wasn't an opening book problem, because there were several >transpositions between the GM game and the Leiden game. > >jm I don't think so. The transpositions at the beginning of the game are normal. From move 8 to 20 the game score is identical. I think The King probably would have played 14.bxc5. I know it's not possible to check every line in those big books. Shouldn't be a problem however to avoid repeating the moves from the master who lost the game. Michael
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.