Author: Tord Romstad
Date: 03:48:42 04/26/04
Go up one level in this thread
On April 26, 2004 at 06:43:34, Fabien Letouzey wrote: >Could you add one with the even more restrictive condition that I use: eval() >= >beta (aka fail-high nodes)? I expect it not to do as well, but a comparison is >always interesting. Yes, that was one of the other conditions I wanted to try. But it is not more, but *less* restrictive than the one used in the version which won my tournament. If you re-read my post, you will see that Gothmog A used eval() - value_of(MyBiggestHangingPiece) >= beta, which obviously implies eval() >= beta. Tord
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.