Author: Odd Gunnar Malin
Date: 04:12:50 04/26/04
Go up one level in this thread
On April 26, 2004 at 06:30:00, José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba wrote: >On April 26, 2004 at 05:48:23, Ernst Walet wrote: > >>I took a closer look at this game. In Leiden I was analyzing this game "real >>time" with Shredder8, and it felt that 80...Nd4+ was winning. Vincent however >>wasn't all to sure about it (as far as I can recall) >> >>I came up with the following line and cannot find any refutation. Seems a win >>IMHO. >> >>Anyone any thoughts about it, maybe a refutation? >> >>Kind regards, >>Ernst. >> >>[D]8/8/4k1p1/p1p5/P1P2PPP/1n6/4K3/8 b - - 80 >> >> >>80... Nd4+ 81. Kf2 Nc6 82. Kf3 Nd4+ 83. Ke3 Nc6 84. Kf3 > >I do not understand why black does not play 82... Nb8 at once. In a game it >might be practical to repeat moves in ordet to gain some time, but in analysis >there is no need for it. > >>Nb8 85. Ke4 Nd7 86. f5+ gxf5+ 87. gxf5+ Kd6 88. Kf4 Ne5 >>89. h5 Nxc4 90. h6 Ne5 91. h7 Nf7 92. Ke3 Kd5 * > >86. h5 looks like a better defence to me (in order to keep control of the e5 >square), but I am not a strong chess player and might be missing something >obvious. >José. 86.h5 runs into Nf6+ and Black win two pawn. But maybe... 82.h5 and after exchange White combines attack on c5 and helping f4 pawn forward. Ex. 82.h5 gxh 83.gxh Kf5 84.Ke3 Nd4 85.h6 Kg6 85.Ke4 Kxh6 86.Kd5 and the knight must gard c5. Odd Gunnar
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.