Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 09:42:18 04/26/04
Go up one level in this thread
On April 26, 2004 at 11:46:38, Peter Skinner wrote: >Not the usual result we are used to from Sjeng.... > >Was there book problems? No, the new book did very well I think, especially given how little time we had to get it ready. >Hardware problems? Nope, machine ran perfectly. I can recommend Athlon64's to everyone. Time to throw that hopelessy oudated 32 bit P4 out of the window :) >Just unlucky? Yeah a bit. The weak endgame cost at least 2 games that could have been won or drawn. I have been improving this but clearly there is more work to do. I wouldn't call this bad luck since it's no secret that Deep Sjengs endgame is not the best. The other improvements didn't really get a chance to show themselves. That *is* bad luck :) Deep Sjeng's result are all over the place - a result of it's unorthodox playing style I think. Bad result in WCCC, good result in Blitz-WCCC, bad result in Leiden, won the CSS tournament, etc... -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.