Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 14:00:22 04/26/04
Go up one level in this thread
On April 26, 2004 at 16:37:16, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On April 26, 2004 at 13:05:27, Sune Fischer wrote: > >>> Bad result in WCCC, good result in Blitz-WCCC, bad >>>result in Leiden, won the CSS tournament, etc... >> >>I guess different hardware, books and operator skills also factors in. > >Hardly. In WCCC and Blitz-WCCC everything was identical, I imagine operator skills could have been a factor in the blitz-WCCC(?). >and in this tournament a very fast machine got a very bad result. Well, that happens. It doesn't take more than 1-2 unlucky games to drop you out of the lead. Considering the randomness of booklines and who meets who in swiss and what colors you get to play... Let's just say I'd be surprised if one of these tournaments actually ended up with all engines according to their proper strength relations. It's practicly guaranteed that some will over or under perform. -S. >-- >GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.