Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: When to do a null move search - an experiment

Author: Gerd Isenberg

Date: 14:04:27 04/28/04

Go up one level in this thread

On April 28, 2004 at 16:50:56, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:

>On April 28, 2004 at 15:03:41, Gerd Isenberg wrote:

<snip>

>>I thought BT-test positions are from some gm matches?
>
>They just have tried to locate anti-positional near to random positions where
>computers had problems with AFAIK and nullmove especially.
>
>So positions where bruteforce is not doing bad.

aha, interesting.

>
>So if you do less selective search somehow in such positions, especially near
>the leafs knowing the poor qsearch from isichess, i am sure that will be
>helpful.
>

I'm always impressed how you appraise other programs.
Thought my qsearch and huge eval too is one of the most sophisticated ;-)

>As long as you do not realize that, then we will continue misunderstanding each
>other here.
>

Sorry i don't get that.
Anyway thanks for your stimulations and lessons.

Gerd

• Re: When to do a null move search - an experiment Vincent Diepeveen 14:36:26 04/28/04
  • Re: When to do a null move search - an experiment Vincent Diepeveen 14:50:43 04/28/04
    • Re: When to do a null move search - an experiment Sune Fischer 15:03:05 04/28/04
      • Re: When to do a null move search - an experiment Vincent Diepeveen 15:20:19 04/28/04

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.