Author: John Merlino
Date: 08:23:24 04/29/04
Go up one level in this thread
On April 29, 2004 at 04:26:06, Jouni Uski wrote: >I wonder why CM9000 is not leading any ratinglist, when it seems to solve >all test positions faster than others... > >Jouni Because the SSDF tests with the default settings, and most people here are analyzing with settings that are specifically tuned for long-term analysis and/or longer time controls. The difference has been shown to be anywhere between 50-100 rating points, depending on who you ask (although I believe it is closer to 50). CM9000 with default settings on the current SSDF list is rated at 2720 in 13th place, less than 100 points from the current leader. Give it another 50 points and it's one point out of 5th place. jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.