Author: margolies,marc
Date: 11:47:08 04/29/04
Go up one level in this thread
Dear Sune, On April 29, 2004 at 13:34:08, Sune Fischer wrote: >On April 29, 2004 at 12:57:39, margolies,marc wrote: > >>Sune, I feel that your sample argument neglects the role of a responsible FIDE >>arbiter in a world championship match. Someone must see progress even if it is >>not involving the exchange of pieces of advancement of pawns. If progress can >>not be shown-- and tablebases will help here-- a draw claim ought to be upheald. >>It is in fact a sad state when an arbiter is unfamiliar with complex endgames >>yet must deal with claims of competing grandmasters under current time controls. >>this has happened in the usa quite a bit. I have heard stories-- but I will not >>repeat them and name individuals. > >Marc, chess is a simple game, let's not make it so complicated that every game >requires a fat book with special rules and a third person as arbiter. > >-S.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.