Author: blass uri
Date: 10:52:29 12/15/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 15, 1998 at 04:52:19, Dan Kiski wrote: > >As stated a few days ago when the subject of CM6555 and CM Faber\Pilz came along >I had found Faber\Pilz beat the standard CM at all time controls. > >Harold Faber asked if I had tested at 2h\40 I stated I had but would re-test. > >First to state settings. CM 6555 taken from >http://www.konts.lv/usr/Didzis/index.html opening book as stated. > >I am still not sure that CM6555 is any different from faber\Pilz. > >All games played on two identical P233 MMX machines each with 64 meg ram. >CM hash at 32 meg. > >Time controls 40 moves in 120 minutes, balance 30 minutes. > > W L D GAMES SCORE >CM 6555 72 52 76 200 110 >CM 6000 52 72 76 200 90 The result is not clearly significant If you give 2 equal programs to play 200 games and if you assume that the probability for white to win is 40% and that the probability for black to win is 30% then the probability of a result of at least 110:90 for one side is close to 10% The probability of a result at least 110:90 for chessmaster 6555 is close to 5% assuming that the programs are equal and the same for a result of at least 110:90 for chessmaster6000. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.