Author: blass uri
Date: 11:08:56 12/15/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 15, 1998 at 13:52:29, blass uri wrote: > >On December 15, 1998 at 04:52:19, Dan Kiski wrote: > >> >>As stated a few days ago when the subject of CM6555 and CM Faber\Pilz came along >>I had found Faber\Pilz beat the standard CM at all time controls. >> >>Harold Faber asked if I had tested at 2h\40 I stated I had but would re-test. >> >>First to state settings. CM 6555 taken from >>http://www.konts.lv/usr/Didzis/index.html opening book as stated. >> >>I am still not sure that CM6555 is any different from faber\Pilz. >> >>All games played on two identical P233 MMX machines each with 64 meg ram. >>CM hash at 32 meg. >> >>Time controls 40 moves in 120 minutes, balance 30 minutes. >> >> W L D GAMES SCORE >>CM 6555 72 52 76 200 110 >>CM 6000 52 72 76 200 90 > >The result is not clearly significant > >If you give 2 equal programs to play 200 games and if you assume that the >probability for white to win is 40% and that the probability for black to win is >30% >then the probability of a result of at least 110:90 for one side is close to 10% > >The probability of a result at least 110:90 for chessmaster 6555 is close to 5% >assuming that the programs are equal and the same for a result of at least >110:90 for chessmaster6000. > >Uri The result may be even less significant because there may be doubled games because the games were played on different 4 computers Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.