Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 20:47:06 04/30/04
Go up one level in this thread
On April 30, 2004 at 23:26:55, Andrew Wagner wrote: >[snip] >> >>Black is already winning in position 2: >> > >Right, I just meant the sac was losing, not the position. In fact, the first >position is also winning without the sac, quite easily. My point with the second >position was that where in the first position the two connected passed pawns >made up for the difference of the rook, in the second position they weren't. I'm >thinking it would be tricky to create a non-expensive eval term for such a >complicated static evaluation. I mean, a human can look at it and quickly see >"the king's not close enough", but that's not so easy for a computer to see >without calculating. It is not that hard either. :) I already do it.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.