Author: Andrew Wagner
Date: 21:03:41 04/30/04
Go up one level in this thread
On April 30, 2004 at 23:47:06, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On April 30, 2004 at 23:26:55, Andrew Wagner wrote: > >>[snip] >>> >>>Black is already winning in position 2: >>> >> >>Right, I just meant the sac was losing, not the position. In fact, the first >>position is also winning without the sac, quite easily. My point with the second >>position was that where in the first position the two connected passed pawns >>made up for the difference of the rook, in the second position they weren't. I'm >>thinking it would be tricky to create a non-expensive eval term for such a >>complicated static evaluation. I mean, a human can look at it and quickly see >>"the king's not close enough", but that's not so easy for a computer to see >>without calculating. > Hmm? You can't be doing too much with it if you're not solving this until 13 ply. >It is not that hard either. :) I already do it.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.