Author: Arturo Ochoa
Date: 21:11:32 04/30/04
Go up one level in this thread
On April 30, 2004 at 23:57:23, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On April 30, 2004 at 23:54:12, Arturo Ochoa wrote: > >>On April 30, 2004 at 23:48:42, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On April 30, 2004 at 23:32:02, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >>> >>>>On April 30, 2004 at 23:23:10, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>> >>>>>On April 30, 2004 at 22:44:40, Chessfun wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Diep is now in the #3 programs >>>>>>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?362447 >>>>>> >>>>>>And Falcon is a Grandmaster strength program about 2700 ELO. >>>>>> >>>>>>And assuming "Shredder 8 is the only engine that consistently scores above 50% >>>>>>against Falcon in my tests" >>>>>>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?362348 we can therefore assume >>>>>>it's #2 >>>>>> >>>>>>That leaves Shredder 8 at #1. >>>>>> >>>>>>Lucky both the #2 and #3 program are neither for sale or available else some may >>>>>>even report they are #1 ;-) >>>>>> >>>>>>I would suggest to both programmers that they get a good team of beta testers >>>>>>and start posting game scores and results that would be deemed realistic. >>>>>> >>>>>>Sarah. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>You know, of course, that you have now entered a world known as "The Twilight >>>>>Zone"? Where fact is fiction, fiction is fact, truth is false, imagination is >>>>>reality, all the other Rod Serling stuff... >>>> >>>>Mmmmm, your rol is very important here too: you must be the screenplay writer of >>>>the production. How many actors will you include in your screenplay? When will >>>>you return from your twilight zone? >>> >>> >>>I don't live in the twilight zone. I don't claim to be in the top three unless >>>we talk open hardware where I have a chance. I don't claim to beat all >>>commercial programs in private tests. I don't claim to have the best eval, the >>>best search, etc... >> >>Finally, I understand: you will simplify some scripts of the screenplay with >>quick solutions. I thought that you had more imagination. > >That's where we differ. This is _not_ about imagination. It is about >reality... At least in my case, apparently not in some "others"... > Not really. I prefer not to say on that topic. However, I would not dare to say any similar declaration as all the thread below without facts. For o against, all the thread is imprudent. I can only say that in ICT4, the Diep book was decisive in three games but it failed in two games: Hydra and Nexus games. Of course, those holes were already solved.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.