Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Mate in 28 Not in 22

Author: Jorge Pichard

Date: 15:14:18 05/01/04

Go up one level in this thread

On May 01, 2004 at 13:16:34, Rob Basham wrote:

>[D]k1b5/Pp1p4/1P1Pp3/4Pp2/5Pp1/6P1/P6P/6K1 w - - 0 1
>
>This is a neat puzzle from
>David Norwood's book...
>"Chess Puzzles"...
>
>Let's See if any program ann. a mate....etc.

I don't think that you can mate in 22, but according to my calculation it is
mate in 28

• Re: Mate in 28 Not in 22 James T. Walker 21:31:53 05/01/04
  • Re: Mate in 28 Not in 22 Dieter Buerssner 12:09:18 05/02/04
    • Re: Mate in 28 Not in 22 James T. Walker 17:55:05 05/02/04
  • Re: It is Mate in 26 Jorge Pichard 06:13:21 05/02/04
    • Re: It is Mate in 26 Martin Baumung 08:38:57 05/02/04
      • Re: Why Shredder 8 found Mate in 28, then it only took 26 moves ? Jorge Pichard 09:09:33 05/02/04
        • Re: Why Shredder 8 found Mate in 28, then it only took 26 moves ? Jorge Pichard 10:09:38 05/02/04
• Re: Sometimes a shootout is better than analysis since.................. Jorge Pichard 15:29:53 05/01/04
  • Re: Sometimes a shootout is better than analysis since.................. Jorge Pichard 17:53:27 05/01/04
  • Re: Sometimes a shootout is better than analysis since.................. Rob Basham 16:03:01 05/01/04

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.