Author: Omid David Tabibi
Date: 14:32:58 05/02/04
Go up one level in this thread
On May 02, 2004 at 13:05:11, rasjid chan wrote: >On May 02, 2004 at 10:45:58, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On May 02, 2004 at 07:24:33, rasjid chan wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>>>Shredder 8 is the only engine that consistently scores above 50% >>> ...against Falcon >>> >>>I'm not english speaking. >>> >>>There NEVER should be a dispute in this! >>> >>>1) consistently (may strictly) mean all the time. Man often use the >>>near meaning - almost all the time. >> >> >>Not really. Consistently means repeatably. My websters says "reproducible" >> >>I can consistently win matches by only one game. Poker players _never_ win >>every hand, but the best consistently win hands... >> >> >>>2) (1) implies batch testing. >>>3) > 50% denotes a winning score or a win in a batch test. >>> >>>So Omid strictly mean Shredder wins him almost all the time. >>>FRITZ AND JUNIOR NEVER DID, maybe only winining on average 20% of >>>the batches (GREAT FALCON) or on average 65% ( == not consistently) >> >>Wrong. >> >> >>>-Poor Falcon in 5th place, Diep 2nd >>>That leaves SnailchessAu in the 6th, poor me. >>> >>>How should I continue. >>> >>>Rasjid > >Sorry. Firstly I didn't know case closed, huge thread. > >I think Omid used it as I used it, the wrong meaning so >everything went exponential. Also as a (weak) human Well, last time we counted I was the third strongest human player amongst the active programmers, after Vincent Diepeveen and Johannes Zwanzger. By FIDE standards I am surely considered a weak player (mere 2250, and it was five years ago), but that is also not that terrible :) >a strong program >is a source of pride and he was (overly) eager to let the world know >it was done. > >Rasjid
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.