Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Let's talk about fraud.

Author: Rolf Tueschen

Date: 00:47:41 05/03/04

Go up one level in this thread

On May 03, 2004 at 01:50:44, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:

>On May 02, 2004 at 21:03:06, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>But it is within the noise
>>range for non-deterministic behavior anyway...
>
>I showed that the difference was statistically
>significant, so that argument holds no water.

Statistical significance isn't simply a little calculation, you must also care
about the correct statistical setup; how can you believe that you could
contradict the noice theory for non-deterministic behavior with a little math
calcul? Please tell us exactly what you did under what conditions and then what
you've found. Step by step so that we could follow.


>
>--
>GCP

• Re: Let's talk about fraud. Vincent Diepeveen 08:14:59 05/03/04
  • Re: Let's talk about fraud. Rolf Tueschen 09:09:50 05/03/04
    • Re: Let's talk about fraud. Robert Hyatt 09:14:00 05/03/04
      • Re: Let's talk about fraud. Rolf Tueschen 09:24:48 05/03/04
        • Re: Let's talk about fraud. Robert Hyatt 09:54:44 05/03/04
  • Re: Let's talk about fraud. Robert Hyatt 09:01:27 05/03/04

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.